Employers Beware: TUPE Risks on the Transfer of a Business by Michelle McDonagh
TUPE is applicable to Employees, apprentices, agency workers and public servants and is designed so that Employees are not treated unfairly or taken advantage of during the transfer of business.
The legislation prevents the dismissal of an Employee by reason of transfer of undertakings and ensuring an Employee’s rights are passed from one Employer to the other. It also requires that Employees and their representatives are informed of the legal, social and economic implications of the transfer and consult with them as well as protecting continuity of representative rights.
An economic identity is defined in the European Communities (Protection of Employees on Transfer of Undertakings) Regulations 2003 as “an organised grouping of resources which has the objective of pursuing an economic activity”.
Generally speaking, this requires consideration of the type of undertaking or business concerned; whether assets, tangible or intangible, are transferring; whether Employees are taken over; whether customers are transferring; and the degree of similarity between activities carried on before and after the transfer, and the period, if any, for which those activities are suspended.
As part of this assessment, the courts will typically examine whether the entity is a stable economic entity and if so, whether its essential characteristics will be maintained. Essentially, the economic entity must continue the same or similar economic activities post transfer.
Apprentices, agency workers, civil servants and anyone working under a contract of employment are all therefore protected by the TUPE Regulations.
i. the date or proposed date of the transfer;
ii. the reasons for the transfer;
iii. the legal implications of the transfer for the Employees and a summary of any relevant economic and social implications of the transfer for them, and any measures envisaged in relation to the Employees.
The original Employer must give this information to the Employees’ representatives not later than 30 days before the transfer, in good time before the transfer occurs and in good time before the Employees are directly affected by the transfer as regards their conditions of work and employment.
If either Employer envisage measures in relation to their Employees, the Employees’ representatives must be consulted not later than 30 days before the transfer is carried out or, in good time before the transfer is carried out (taking into account any relevant timing of the Employee measures) with a view to reaching an agreement. Where there are no Employee representatives, the Employers must arrange for the Employees to choose (including by means of an election) representatives for this purpose.
However, if there are still no Employees’ representatives in the undertaking through no fault of the Employees, the Employees concerned must be notified in writing, where reasonably practicable, not later than 30 days before the transfer and, in any event, in good time before the transfer, with the particulars described at (i), (ii) and (iii) above.
Certain functions within an Organisation may be deemed to be an economic entity for the purposes of TUPE. If these functions are outsourced, insourced or the existing service provider is changed, the TUPE Regulations may apply. Business functions like IT, distribution, cleaning, and security may fall within the scope of the TUPE Regulations.
Where a business function like cleaning or maintenance for example is outsourced to a third party, the nature of the work is likely to be the same regardless of whether it is completed by Employees or outsourced to a third party. For the TUPE Regulations to apply however, an outsourcing event must also involve the transfer of significant tangible or intangible assets or the transfer of a major part of the workforce carrying out the outsourced function.
The new Employer must not terminate the employment of Employees on the basis of the transfer alone. The new Employer may however make dismissals for economic, technical or organisational reasons, or in other words make redundancies.
If an employment is terminated because a transfer involves a substantial deterioration in the working conditions of the Employee, the Employer concerned is regarded as having been responsible for the termination and is exposed to the risk of an unfair dismissal claim or a claim under the TUPE Regulations.
However, where there is a pension scheme in operation in the original Employer’s business at the time of the transfer, the TUPE Regulations provide that:
- if the scheme is an occupational pension scheme within the meaning of the Pensions Act, 1990, then the protections afforded by the Pensions Act apply to any such scheme, and
- in respect of the pension schemes which do not come within the remit of the Pensions Act, the new Employer must ensure that rights conferring immediate or prospective entitlement to old age benefits, including survivor’s benefits, are protected.
Organisations that are considering either the sale or purchase of a business that involves a change in Employer must therefore carefully consider their legal obligations under the TUPE Regulations.
Michelle McDonagh, MSc. HR Strategies, Chartered MCIPD, PGDip Employment Law is an experienced Human Resources and Employment Law practitioner. Advising and supporting a wide variety of organisations across the private, not for profit and public sector, Michelle uses her expertise and strategic focus to analyse organisations and build a tailored HR model to support achievement of the organisational goals. Key areas of focus are organisational design, enhancing critical skills, leadership development, day to day practical Human Resources and Employment Law advices underpinned by a positive employee experience.