Employer Reporting of Benefits by Jane Quirke & Clare Fitzgerald
There are three categories of non-taxable items, which are currently in scope for reporting: travel and subsistence, the small benefit exemption and the remote working daily allowance.
- Enhancement of Revenue’s compliance framework.
- Diversion of resources and contacts away from compliant employers.
- Providing increased visibility and assurance to employees that their income is being reported Properly to Revenue.
- Provision of meaningful and effective high-level data to the Department of Finance.
In practice employers reimburse expenses, weekly, bi-weekly or monthly and small benefits may be provided on an ad-hoc basis. Revenue must be notified “on or before” any reportable item is provided to employees and directors which therefore creates a very onerous requirement for employers.
The date the payment is made, or the date the small benefit is provided to employees and directors is the relevant date for determining what reportable items are in scope.
- Remote working allowance of €3.20 per day;
- Small benefit exemption; and
- Travel and subsistence.
Remote working allowance
The remote working allowance, of up to €3.20 per day, which employers can pay to employees for each day worked from home (subject to conditions).
Travel and subsistence
Payments by employers to employees to reimburse business related travel and subsistence costs including:
- Vouched travel and subsistence
- Unvouched travel and subsistence e.g. civil service mileage rates
- Country money
- Emergency travel
- Eating on site allowance
Small benefit exemption
Vouchers or benefits provided to employees that come within the ‘small benefit exemption’ regime i.e. currently, up to two small benefits each year that do not exceed an aggregate value of €1,000.
- By file upload through ROS. The ROS ERR system can only accept JSON or XML file formats. Employers must ensure that their returns are in the correct format and that the files include all required data, to ensure the files upload to ROS successfully;
- Manual entry of relevant details on ROS via the specific ERR portal; or
- Using a software package that files directly to ROS e.g. an add-on to an existing payroll software or expense software.
- Engage with all relevant internal stakeholders so as to determine who is responsible for ERR filings.
- Review the data required for ERR submissions and determine how it can be extracted in an appropriate reporting format. In small organisations one person may hold all of the data required for ERR, however in larger organisations data may be managed by multiple teams outside of the payroll process, for example, by HR, finance or by a separate expenses team.
- Review where employee data is maintained. If reporting is done via payroll, then employee data required for ERR submissions should be held on payroll software. However, where reporting is done outside of the payroll process, employers need to put in place a mechanism to merge employee data with the other reportable ERR data.
- Review policies to ensure they align with tax legislation and Revenue guidance. Analyse data before Revenue does and consider whether any policy changes are required including any retrospective non-compliance which may need to be addressed via a self-correction or voluntary disclosure.
- Review controls in place to track all non-cash benefits provided to employees. Under the small benefit exemption, if more than two benefits are provided in a tax year, only the first two may qualify for exemption.
- Determine how reporting will be done i.e. via payroll software supplier, expenses software supplier or manually.
- Consider whether current expense payment timeframes need to be amended, for example, where an employer has an on-demand expense payment policy, it may be beneficial to change to a more structured process to reduce administration.
Are travel and subsistence paid directly by the employer to a third party in scope for ERR reporting?
Expenses paid directly by the employer to third parties e.g. hotels or travel provider, in relation to business travel expenses are not currently in scope for ERR reporting.
For a reporting requirement to arise under ERR in relation to travel and subsistence, the employer must reimburse the employee for the travel expenses incurred by the employee. Travel expenses incurred on company credit cards and settled by the employer are not in the scope of ERR reporting.
Do per diems fall under the reporting?
Yes. Daily allowances paid to employees (e.g. civil service subsistence rates) fall under travel and subsistence. They are therefore in-scope for ERR and are reportable.
Such expenses should be reported under the ‘Unvouched travel and subsistence’ category.
If travel expenses are reimbursed for a Director who is not paid a salary and hence not on payroll, does this fall within the scope of ERR reporting?
ERR applies to directors and employees. The payments of travel and subsistence paid to directors are reportable under ERR even where the director is not on payroll i.e. as no remuneration other than tax-free subsistence is paid.
Is a correction facility available for ERR submissions?
A correction facility is available if incorrect details are reported i.e. individual expense/benefit line items can be amended or deleted. Further details and examples of how specific corrections can be made are available on Revenue’s website.
Are receipts required when reporting ERR?
Receipts are not required as part of an ERR submission. However, employers are expected to keep robust records in support of non-taxable payments.
That administrative burden is only likely to increase in the future as Revenue have confirmed that ERR is just “phase one” of a phased introduction of additional reporting for employers so we can expect further items to fall within the scope of reporting in the future.
It is clear that the area of payroll tax compliance has become a key focus area for Revenue.
ERR will provide Revenue with increased visibility of non-taxable items being paid to employees on a real time basis along with data capable of being used for risk-profiling purposes and analysed by Revenue during the course of payroll tax compliance interventions. We are therefore likely to see more focused payroll interventions on these non-taxable items going forward.
Jane joined Grant Thornton in 2011 having previously worked as a tax manager of a Big Four firm. She has worked both in Ireland and abroad having worked for a Big 4 firm in the UK where she specialized in global employment tax.
She also has experience in providing tax advisory and compliance services to individuals.